Board · C-Suite · Ship Owners

Decisions That
Move Markets

The scenarios Clarksons, top maritime law firms, and shipping banks charge six figures to solve — MarineGPT solves in minutes.

"MarineGPT is the complete AI platform for shipping professionals, delivering intelligent decision support, commercial risk analysis, daily operational assistance, and maritime training."

Who Uses MarineGPT

The decision-makers across the shipping enterprise

Ship Owner / Board

  • Fleet disposal & acquisition strategy
  • Newbuilding vs second-hand IRR
  • CII fleet compliance roadmap
  • Sale and leaseback structuring
  • Capital allocation at cycle turns

CFO / Treasurer

  • DSCR stress testing pre-credit
  • Covenant headroom analysis
  • Refinancing triggers & bridge finance
  • Portfolio VaR and CVaR
  • Bank negotiation preparation

Head of Chartering

  • TC rate negotiation intelligence
  • Off-hire dispute & attribution
  • Charter party form selection
  • Force majeure & deviation claims
  • Freight market forward curve analysis

DPA / Legal Counsel

  • Sanctions exposure & OFAC analysis
  • Vessel arrest & P&I LOU strategy
  • CP arbitration vs settlement EV
  • Director personal liability (§13)
  • Force majeure clause interpretation

Institutional Investor / PE

  • Shipping portfolio VaR modelling
  • IRR across cycle scenarios
  • Credit rating equivalent analysis
  • Altman Z-Score counterparty risk
  • LP-ready risk reporting

Category

Mode

Showing 17 use cases

Board & Fleet Strategy

3 use cases

Ship Owner / Board Director·Decision Engine

Fleet Disposal Decision at Cycle Turn

BCI at 1,200. Three 15-year Capesizes due drydock in 8 months. Sell now, drydock and extend, or sell post-drydock?

You ask MarineGPT

"BCI currently 1,200. We own three 15-year-old Capesizes. Each faces a $3.5M drydock in Q3. Cycle sentiment is mixed — orderbook 8%, China slowdown risk. Should we sell now at $22M each, drydock and continue trading, or sell post-drydock? Model all three scenarios with IRR, break-even TCE, and scrap value floor."

What You Get

Decision Engine runs all three paths: (1) Sell Now — net proceeds vs scrap value, opportunity cost. (2) Drydock + Extend — IRR on $3.5M capex at P25/P50/P75 BCI scenarios, break-even TCE required to justify spend, payback period, CII rating post-drydock. (3) Sell Post-Drydock — incremental value from class-fresh certificate, market timing risk, insurance carry cost. BOTTOM LINE: numbered directive with trigger — the BCI level at which drydock becomes NPV-negative.

Decision worth $15–25M per vessel. Getting it wrong costs more than the drydock itself.

Fleet Manager / Commercial Director·Decision Engine

Fleet-Wide CII Compliance Strategy

Board review: 12-vessel fleet, 4 rated D or E. Regulatory deadline 18 months. Sell, slow steam, scrubber, or early retirement?

You ask MarineGPT

"We have 12 vessels. Fleet CII audit shows 4 rated D or E. Board wants a compliance roadmap in 18 months before Paris MoU enforcement bites. For each vessel: model slow-steaming impact on TCE, scrubber retrofit NPV, and sale value vs scrap. Which vessels do we remediate and which do we exit?"

What You Get

Decision Engine runs vessel-by-vessel: CII attained rating (gCO₂/dwt·nm), gap to C-band, slow-steam TCE penalty (speed reduction 1–2 knots, revenue loss vs fuel saving), scrubber retrofit IRR vs fuel spread duration required, EOPL/scrap value vs trading value. Fleet-level matrix: REMEDIATE / EXIT / MONITOR per vessel. Timeline with CII deterioration curve and enforcement trigger dates.

Fleet compliance strategy prevents charter rejection, port detention, and covenant breach on green finance facilities.

Ship Owner / CFO·Decision Engine

Newbuilding vs Second-Hand Acquisition

Capital allocation: $120M budget. Order two Kamsarmax newbuildings at $38M each or buy four 7-year second-hands at $28M each?

You ask MarineGPT

"We have $120M capital to deploy in dry bulk. Option A: order two Kamsarmax newbuildings at $38M each, delivery 30 months. Option B: buy four 7-year second-hand Kamsamaxes at $28M each, immediate trading. Model IRR, TCE break-even, leverage impact, CII exposure, and residual value at 15 years for both strategies. Current BPI: 1,450."

What You Get

Decision Engine models both: Newbuilding IRR — delivery lag cost, orderbook queue risk, speculative fleet, BIMCO 2024 clause leverage, green premium on charter. Second-hand IRR — immediate cash flow, drydock timing, CII trajectory (7-year vessel at BPI P50), residual value decay curve. Side-by-side: break-even BPI required, leverage sensitivity at 60% LTV/65% LTV, point at which newbuilding NPV exceeds second-hand NPV. DIRECTIVE: which path wins at current cycle position.

Capital allocation decision across $120M. Cycle mistiming destroys equity value in 18 months.

Capital Risk & Ship Finance

3 use cases

Shipping Bank / Credit Committee·Risk Analyst

Pre-Credit DSCR Stress Test — Capesize Bareboat

Credit committee needs DSCR analysis across rate scenarios before approving a $45M 5-year Capesize bareboat loan.

You ask MarineGPT

"We are approving a $45M, 5-year bareboat loan on a 2018-built Capesize. Current BCI: 1,400. Loan: 65% LTV, SOFR+250bps, semi-annual repayments. Run DSCR at P75/P50/P25/P05 BCI scenarios. Include correlated stress (rates −33%, vessel values −30%, SOFR +150bps simultaneously). Flag covenant breach points and DSRA adequacy."

What You Get

Risk Analyst delivers: DSCR table across all four rate scenarios with LTV columns and covenant flags (🔴🟡🟢), break-even BCI calculation, correlated stress DSCR (the scenario that kills the deal), DSRA adequacy check — months of cover vs P25 scenario, covenant breach timeline with cure period analysis, credit rating equivalent (BB− / B+) with implied spread vs SOFR, and explicit IC recommendation: APPROVE / DECLINE / CONDITIONAL with structural requirements.

Credit committee has audit-ready DSCR analysis in minutes. Structural requirements identified before term sheet.

PE Fund / Infrastructure Investor·Risk Analyst

Shipping Portfolio VaR — Red Sea Rerouting Shock

LP portfolio review: 8-vessel mixed fleet (Capesize/VLCC) with Red Sea exposure. Quantify revenue risk at 95% and 99% CI.

You ask MarineGPT

"Our 8-vessel shipping portfolio (4 Capesizes, 4 VLCCs) has significant Red Sea exposure. With Houthi attacks forcing Cape rerouting on Asia-Europe tanker legs: calculate 95% and 99% VaR on annual portfolio revenue. Include correlated stress across both asset classes. Decompose by route premium components: fuel, war risk insurance, transit time. Model normalization scenario if Suez reopens in 6 months."

What You Get

Risk Analyst delivers: parametric and historical simulation VaR at 95% CI and 99% CI in absolute dollars and % annual revenue, CVaR/Expected Shortfall, portfolio decomposition by asset class with diversification benefit (r≈0.68 between Capesize/VLCC), route premium breakdown per leg (fuel +14 days × $590/MT, war risk 0.3–0.8% of hull value, transit time revenue loss), maximum drawdown duration, Suez normalization sensitivity — P&L swing on 6-month vs 12-month re-opening, LP-level reporting summary.

LP committee receives distributional risk context, not a single-point estimate. Hedge sizing informed by CVaR.

Ship Owner / Treasurer·Risk Analyst

Sale and Leaseback Structuring

Release $30M capital from three vessels via sale-leaseback without triggering covenant breaches or CII complications.

You ask MarineGPT

"We want to release equity from three Aframaxes (10-year-old, valued at $38–42M each) via sale and leaseback. Counterparty is a Singapore leasing house. Structure: 7-year bareboat, quarterly hire. Constraints: (1) existing bank facility covenant — net debt/EBITDA <4.5x; (2) CII obligations transfer to lessee; (3) purchase option at year 5 at a pre-agreed price. Model the structure: capital release, P&L impact, leverage ratio post-transaction, effective cost of funds vs current facility rate."

What You Get

Risk Analyst structures: capital release calculation (sale price vs book value vs tax basis), hire rate back-calculation for target IRR to lessor, effective cost of funds to owner (comparing hire cost vs bank margin), covenant test post-transaction (net debt/EBITDA before/after), purchase option pricing (Black-Scholes vessel value optionality), CII obligation transfer language flag, cross-default risk on existing facility, and recommendation on whether transaction enhances or damages overall capital structure.

Transaction modelled before lawyers are instructed. $30M capital release structured without covenant breach.

Geopolitical & Sanctions Exposure

3 use cases

Ship Owner / Board Director·Decision Engine

Sanctions Exposure Assessment — Counterparty at Risk

One of our key charterers has a 60% probability of OFAC designation next quarter. Voyage charter in force. $14M exposure. What do we do?

You ask MarineGPT

"Our primary charterer (a Russian commodity trader) has been flagged by our P&I club as having 60% OFAC designation probability in Q2. We have an active voyage charter with $14M cargo value, vessel currently mid-voyage, cargo destination Rotterdam. What are our obligations, our exposure if we complete delivery, and our options if we terminate early?"

What You Get

Decision Engine triggers §19 Binary Rejection Protocol: sanctions exposure level exceeds threshold — CONDITIONAL STOP pending legal path. Analysis: OFAC designation timing vs voyage completion ETA (window to complete lawfully), 50 USC § 1705 criminal exposure on owner if completing post-designation, P&I Club Rule 54 implications (coverage withdrawal on sanctions breach), 4 legal paths — (1) complete before designation date + OFAC general license check, (2) divert to neutral port + cargo discharge, (3) apply for OFAC Specific License, (4) invoke CP force majeure clause. §13 Director personal liability section triggered: D&O exposure, VSD (voluntary self-disclosure) 50% penalty reduction window.

Owner avoids IEEPA criminal liability. Structured exit preserves P&I cover and prevents OFAC civil penalty ($1M+ per day).

Commercial Director / DPA·Decision Engine

Fleet Redeployment — Russia Trade Exit

Board decision: exit all Russian trade routes in 60 days. 4 vessels currently on Russia-related cargo. Model commercial impact and redeployment plan.

You ask MarineGPT

"Board has decided to exit all Russia-linked cargo in 60 days. We have 4 vessels: 2 Suezmax on crude (Primorsk-Rotterdam), 1 Handysize on grain (Novorossiysk-Egypt), 1 MR tanker on products (Baltic-Europe). For each vessel: current fixture value, break cost, market equivalent fixture rate on alternative routes, TCE delta, and total commercial impact of exit."

What You Get

Decision Engine models each vessel: current Russia-leg TCE vs market equivalent (clean Baltic product alternative, North Sea crude), break cost calculation (demurrage, cargo release, charter party termination provision), alternative fixture availability and TCE delta, vessel redeployment route and timeline. Fleet-level P&L impact: worst case (immediate exit, market trough), base case (60-day managed exit), best case (fixtures timed to market strength). War risk premium removal benefit offsetting rate delta. DIRECTIVE: exit sequence by vessel, starting with highest sanctions-risk/lowest TCE-cost.

Managed exit preserves P&I cover. Commercial impact quantified before press release and bank notification.

Master / DPA·Decision Engine

Vessel Arrest — 24-Hour Crisis Protocol

Vessel arrested at Singapore. Mortgage default triggered. Bank demanding $8M repayment within 24 hours. Port agent saying legal team is needed urgently.

You ask MarineGPT

"MV Pacific Fortune arrested this morning at Singapore anchorage. Mortgage default: we missed two consecutive loan installments totalling $2.1M. Bank has obtained arrest warrant. Crew of 22 aboard. We have $8M in debt outstanding. Port agent says we have 24 hours before sheriff sale proceedings. What are our immediate options?"

What You Get

Decision Engine activates CRISIS tier — IMMEDIATE ACTIONS in sentence one. Analysis: Singapore Admiralty arrest procedure (O 70 Rules of Court), sheriff sale timeline (typically 5–14 days, not 24 hours — correct misunderstanding), bail options (P&I Club Letter of Undertaking vs cash bail vs Club letter), owner negotiation leverage (bank prefers loan restructure to depressed sheriff sale price), crew welfare obligations (MLC 2006 — wages protected, repatriation duty), flag state notification requirement, parallel tracks: (1) P&I LOU application — fastest path to release, (2) direct bank negotiation with standstill agreement, (3) refinancing emergency bridge from alternative lender. Escalation timeline with hard deadlines.

Owner gains 5–14 days by understanding the actual timeline. P&I LOU path prevents sheriff sale at 40% below market value.

Commercial Disputes & Charter Party

3 use cases

Ship Owner / P&I Correspondent·Decision Engine

Off-hire Dispute — Engine Breakdown Attribution

Charterer claiming 11 days off-hire after main engine failure. Owner disputes cause. NYPE 2015. $28,500/day hire. $313,500 at stake.

You ask MarineGPT

"Vessel was off-hire 11 days following main engine turbocharger failure. Charterer claims full off-hire under NYPE 2015 Clause 17. Owner argues breakdown was caused by charterer's order to run at abnormal speed on previous leg (106% MCR for 8 hours). Hire rate: $28,500/day. Calculate off-hire exposure, assess owner's defence, and advise on arbitration vs settlement strategy."

What You Get

Decision Engine analyses: NYPE 2015 Clause 17 — off-hire trigger (vessel 'lost to charterers' due to breakdown), attribution test (owner's latent defect vs charterer's operational fault), burden of proof (charterer must prove vessel in efficient state at delivery), engine log analysis framing (MCR exceedance + consequential damage chain), Legal EV calculation: P(owner wins attribution defence) × $313,500 vs P(settle) × settlement floor, LMAA arbitration cost estimate ($80–120k), comparable awards on similar attribution disputes. DIRECTIVE: pursue partial off-hire defence + initiate without prejudice settlement at $157,500 (50% of claim) with counterclaim for MCR damage repair.

Structured dispute strategy saves $80–150k versus undefended payment or costly full arbitration.

Charterer / Operations Manager·Decision Engine

Force Majeure — Red Sea Deviation Claim

Charterer ordered vessel via Suez. Owner diverted via Cape due to Houthi threat. 14 extra days, $180,000 additional bunkers. Who pays?

You ask MarineGPT

"We chartered MV Atlantic Bridge on GENCON 1994 for Rotterdam-Singapore cargo. Voyage ordered via Suez. Owner diverted via Cape of Good Hope citing Houthi security threat without charterer consent. Deviation added 14 days and $180,000 in bunkers. Owner claims force majeure and security risk. Charterer disputes — no formal war risk designation by JWC at time of deviation. Advise on liability."

What You Get

Decision Engine analyses: GENCON deviation clause (liberty clause scope vs reasonable deviation), JWC breach area designation status on deviation date (critical: if not JWC-listed at time, owner's force majeure claim weakens), SCOPIC/LOF implications, owner's SOLAS V duty of care vs charterer's route order authority, proportionality test on $180k claim, force majeure clause triggers (GENCON 1994 Clause 19), freight pre-payment vs freight at destination impact. Legal EV: P(charterer liable for deviation costs) at 35–45% if no JWC designation, owner's counterclaim for security risk premium. DIRECTIVE: negotiate deviation cost share 60/40 charterer/owner with deviation notice obligation inserted in charter addendum.

Dispute framework prevents $180k undefended payment. Addendum clause prevents recurrence.

Chartering Manager·Decision Engine

Charter Rate Negotiation — Market Intelligence Brief

Fixing a 12-month TC for a 2016 VLCC next week. Need real market intelligence: current rates, forward curve, and negotiation position.

You ask MarineGPT

"We are fixing a 12-month time charter for our 2016-built VLCC (300,000 DWT, MR compliant, scrubber-fitted) next week. Current TD3C Worldscale. What is the fair market rate for this vessel? What are the forward FFA indications? Which way is the market trending? And what leverage do we have in negotiation given the vessel's scrubber fit and recent trading history?"

What You Get

Decision Engine provides: current TD3C WS rate and TCE equivalent, 12-month TC market (Baltic Exchange fixture data, recent comparable charters), FFA forward curve for Q2/Q3/Q4 — contango vs backwardation signal, scrubber premium quantification ($2,500–4,000/day at current HSFO/VLSFO spread), 2016 vintage discount vs eco-vessel (age penalty on TCE), charterer demand analysis (major traders vs oil majors vs state companies — appetite by vessel spec), negotiation levers: scrubber value, delivery port flexibility, redelivery range, and floor rate below which trade alternative (spot voyages) generates higher TCE. DIRECTIVE: open at $X, floor at $Y, counter tactics if charterer anchors low.

Owner enters negotiation with market intelligence advantage. $500/day improvement over 12 months = $182,500.

Maritime Academy — Structured Learning

3 use cases

Junior Shipping Professional·Academy

Understanding Voyage Economics from First Principles

New to chartering team. Need to understand how TCE is calculated and why it drives every commercial decision.

You ask MarineGPT

"I've just joined a shipping company as a junior chartering analyst. I keep hearing about TCE but don't fully understand it. Can you teach me: what is TCE, how is it calculated for a voyage charter, why does it matter for fixture decisions, and what are the key variables that move it?"

What You Get

Academy delivers a phased curriculum calibrated to junior analyst level: (1) TCE definition — Time Charter Equivalent, the common currency of ship economics; (2) Formula walkthrough — (Gross Freight − Port Costs − Bunkers − Canal Fees − Commissions) ÷ Voyage Days; (3) Worked example with real numbers (Rotterdam-Singapore, Panamax, current market); (4) Why TCE drives fixture decisions — comparing a spot voyage vs TC offer on the same basis; (5) Key variables — bunker price sensitivity, speed, port costs by geography, canal fees; (6) Common pitfalls — why comparing freight rates without TCE calculation misleads; (7) Practice problems with answers. Adaptive: follow-up questions trigger deeper content.

Junior analyst builds commercial foundation in hours, not months of shadowing senior staff.

Maritime MBA Student / Officer Transitioning to Shore·Academy

Charter Party Forms — The Whole Landscape

Preparing for chartering career. Need to understand NYPE, GENCON, BPTIME, Shellvoy — what each does and when each is used.

You ask MarineGPT

"I'm an ex-chief officer transitioning to a commercial role. I need to understand the charter party landscape: what are the main forms (NYPE 2015, GENCON 2022, BPTIME 4, Shellvoy 6, Barecon 2017), when is each used, and what are the key commercial clauses that determine how money flows between owner and charterer?"

What You Get

Academy delivers structured curriculum: (1) CP taxonomy — voyage vs time vs bareboat, what each transfers (risk, control, cost); (2) GENCON — voyage charter workhorse, freight, laytime/demurrage, NOR, Clauses 8/9/16/19; (3) NYPE — time charter standard, Clause 8 employment/indemnity, Clause 13 speed/consumption, Clause 17 off-hire; (4) BPTIME 4 — tanker TC, oil major provisions; (5) Shellvoy 6 — voyage tanker charter, Worldscale; (6) Barecon 2017 — bareboat/financial lease; (7) Addenda and rider clauses that change everything. Each form: who uses it, commercial purpose, 3 clauses every executive must know. Examination-style practice questions.

Commercial foundation built systematically. Officer transition to commercial role accelerated by 6–12 months.

Ship Owner / Director (Non-Maritime Background)·Academy

Maritime Finance Fundamentals for Board Members

New non-executive director on shipping company board. Need to understand the financial language of shipping before first board meeting.

You ask MarineGPT

"I've just been appointed as a non-executive director of a listed shipping company. I have a finance background but no maritime experience. Before my first board meeting I need to understand: how does shipping finance work (LTV, DSCR, covenants), what drives vessel values (NAV), what are the key P&L drivers (TCE, off-hire), and what questions should a NED ask management about fleet performance?"

What You Get

Academy delivers a maritime finance primer for board-level non-specialists: (1) Vessel as asset — NAV calculation, depreciation, residual value; (2) Ship finance structure — mortgage, LTV ratio, typical covenant package (DSCR, minimum liquidity, minimum hull value); (3) Income statement — TCE as top-line metric, daily opex benchmark (Opex per day by vessel type), EBITDA in shipping context; (4) Cash flow — why EBITDA ≠ cash in shipping (drydock cycles, DSRA requirements); (5) Key board questions: fleet CII trajectory, covenant headroom, DSRA adequacy, charter cover %, counterparty credit exposure; (6) Red flags to watch: off-hire above 3%, consecutive DSCR misses, deferred drydocks. Board-ready in one session.

NED boards prepared to challenge management on maritime metrics. Governance strengthened.

Operations Desk — Daily Excellence

2 use cases

Master·Operations Desk

Engine Failure — Multi-Option Decision at Sea

Main engine turbocharger seized 150nm SW of Singapore. Weather deteriorating. Crew safe. What are my immediate options?

You ask MarineGPT

"Complete engine failure. Position 150nm SW of Singapore. Main engine turbocharger seized — cannot restart. Weather: Force 6, deteriorating to Force 7. Crew 22, all safe. Cargo: 45,000 MT grain, B/L issued. What are my immediate options, notification sequence, and commercial implications?"

What You Get

Operations Desk activates CRISIS tier: IMMEDIATE ACTIONS in sentence one. Nearest emergency anchorage options with ETA under tow, Singapore tug availability and ETA (4–6 hours at 150nm), Class notification requirement (within 24h for machinery casualty), flag state GMDSS report, P&I Club 24h emergency line (notification within 24h to preserve cover), charterer notification obligation under NYPE/CP form, salvage risk assessment (Force 7 drift calculation before tug arrives), cargo heating/ventilation requirements during casualty. Parallel: repair options (Singapore shipyard tow vs at-sea repair team by helicopter), commercial off-hire calculation under CP form, and notification checklist with timestamps.

Master has structured response in under 3 minutes. Parallel notifications protect P&I cover and commercial position.

Chief Engineer·Operations Desk

SECA Compliance — Fuel Changeover Procedure

Entering North Sea SECA in 4 hours. Need to verify compliance procedure and log requirements.

You ask MarineGPT

"We enter the North Sea SECA boundary in 4 hours. Current bunkers: main engine VLSFO 0.49%, auxiliary ULSFO 0.09%, scrubber fitted but EGR under maintenance. Walk me through the exact compliance procedure, logbook entries required, and what happens if scrubber fails after SECA entry."

What You Get

Operations Desk delivers: MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 14 — North Sea SECA 0.1% SOx limit, 3 compliance pathways (ULSFO, scrubber, EGCS with EGR caveat), fuel changeover timing calculation (4 hours at current consumption — quantity required to flush main engine before SECA boundary), ORB entry format (exact log wording required), BDN verification checklist, scrubber failure contingency (switch to ULSFO within 1 hour of EGR failure, master's log entry, flag state notification if unable to comply), PSC risk if stopped in SECA without compliant fuel or valid ORB entries. Sample log entries ready to copy.

Zero MARPOL violations. Correct ORB entries prevent PSC detention ($50k+ per incident).

Ready to Try

Experience These
Decisions Yourself

Click any use case's "Try This" button to open it in MarineGPT with the full query pre-loaded. No signup required.